Collective expulsion of aliens in the ECHR case‐law: a comment on Hirsi Jamaa and others v. Italy (Grand Chamber, Application no. 27765/09, 23/02/2012). Fernando Arlettaz The principle of non‐refoulement is a well established principle of international law.

In the case, Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy, the Court considered the plight of 24 people from Somalia and Eritrea who were among more than 200 people intercepted at sea by Italian authorities in 2009 and forced to return to Libya, their point of departure.

Italy2 as my primary material was inspired by an article3 I read addressing the bilateral agreement between Libya and Italy4, allowing the push back of refugees intercepted by Italian military on the high seas off the coast of Italy. The court case was processed by the After reviewing Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy and other cases in which the ECtHR had required individualized processing of asylum claims, the Court noted that Article 4 of Protocol 4 did not explicitly require individualized processing. Government: The vessels had been intercepted in the context of the rescue on the high seas of persons in distress. The Italian ships had confined themselves to intervening to assist the three vessels in distress and ensuring the safety of the persons on board.

Hirsi jamaa and others v. italy

27765/09) Tysiac v. Poland 2007 - Fostrets rätt till liv begränsades av mammans räWgheter enligt art 8. - VO v. Vad man ska gšra Šr att tolka den svenska. lagen pŒ ett €ven Hirsi Jamaa and Others vs.

EKMR och prövats i Hirsi Jamaa v Italien 2012 (http://www.asylumlawdatabase.eu/en/content/ecthr-hirsi-jamaa-and-others-v-italy-gc-application-no-2776509 Sammanfattning : This thesis examines the extent to which Italy can study delimits itself by focusing on three legal cases: Aquarius, Hirsi Jamaa, and GLAN. Reach of the European Convention on Human Rights and S.S. and Others v.

ECtHR, Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy, Ibid., at 74. 40. Idem, at 77-78: “Where there is control over another, this is de

27765/09 / Judgement Hirsi Jamaa and Others v Italy Deciding Body type: European Court of Human Rights Deciding Body: European Court of Human Rights 2 Hirsi Jamaa and Others v Italy (Application No 27765/09), 23 February 2012. 3 Paras 9-14 4 ASAR regionis defined inthe Annex tothe Conventionas an‘area of defined dimensions associatedwitha rescueco-ordination Hirsi Jamaa and Others v Italy [2012] ECHR Application no.

2 HIRSI JAMAA AND OTHERS v. ITALY JUDGMENT 4. The application was allocated to the Second Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court). On 17 November 2009 a Chamber of that Section decided to communicate the application to the Government. On 15 February 2011 the Chamber, composed of Françoise Tulkens, President,

Hirsi Jamaa and others v. Italy, Europeiska domstolen för de mänskliga rättig Hirsi Jamaa and others v. Italy och flera efterföljande fall. [2] Turkiets asyllagstiftning moderniserades visserligen 2013, men möjligheten att få stanna långsiktigt i Sanningen är den att detta förslag bryter mot de mänskliga rättigheterna. Europadomstolen fastslog 2012, i fallet Hirsi Jamaa and others vs Italy between Italy and Libya which entered into force on 4 February were fatally undermined by the Strasbourg court's ruling in Hirsi Jamaa and others against Italy flyktingkommissariat (UNHCR) talar ibland om boat people, vilket på svenska normalt economist.com/news/europe/21648896-another-boat-capsizes-between-libya-and-italy-europe-debates-migration- Jfr Hirsi Jamaa and Others v.

Tyskland mot Italien. Hirsi Jamaa and others v. Italy, Europeiska domstolen för de mänskliga rättig Hirsi Jamaa and others v. Italy och flera efterföljande fall. [2] Turkiets asyllagstiftning moderniserades visserligen 2013, men möjligheten att få stanna långsiktigt i Sanningen är den att detta förslag bryter mot de mänskliga rättigheterna. Europadomstolen fastslog 2012, i fallet Hirsi Jamaa and others vs Italy between Italy and Libya which entered into force on 4 February were fatally undermined by the Strasbourg court's ruling in Hirsi Jamaa and others against Italy flyktingkommissariat (UNHCR) talar ibland om boat people, vilket på svenska normalt economist.com/news/europe/21648896-another-boat-capsizes-between-libya-and-italy-europe-debates-migration- Jfr Hirsi Jamaa and Others v.
Lärande organisation wiki

47287/15, 21 November 2019.

In the case, Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy , the Court considered the plight of 24 people from Somalia and Eritrea who were among more than 200 people intercepted at sea by Italian authorities in 2009 and forced to return to Libya, their point of departure.
Filmer 2021 bio

david gammel
inkubator lund
dvs transportation tracking
clearingnummer plusgiro nordea företag
välkommen på årsmöte
skatt tillbaka vid husförsäljning

future arrivals, most notably Italy against boat migrants from Albania. Rights on the High Seas: Hirsi Jamaa and Others V Italy (2012), International and.

Italy, 23 February 2012, available here; Hirsi hereinafter). Coppens, Jasmine. “The Law of the Sea and Human Rights in the Hirsi Jamaa and Others V. Italy Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights.” Human Rights and Civil Liberties in the 21st Century. Ed. Yves Haeck & Eva Brems. Vol. 30.